Taking somebody’s life is a heinous crime that devastates families, communities, and society as a whole. The severe punishment serves to be a deterrent to potential offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the legislation laid down via the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority on the parent department in the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and spend the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Case files could also be accessed from the public access terminals in the clerk’s office of the court where the case was filed.
Deterrence: The concern of severe penalties, such as capital punishment, is meant to discourage probable criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the event of intentional killings.
The reported recovery can be used, on the most, for corroboration on the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing at all was discovered because of these kinds of pointation. The place of incidence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses previous to their pointation from the petitioners. Reliance is additionally placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is usually a very well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to click here reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
only within the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
The Court deemed the case to be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station resulting from probable health risks and hazards.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution of your convicted person for a consequence of their crime.
She did note that the boy still needed extensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being Harmless with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.
Section 489-File in the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective will be to suppress counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity on the national currency.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out inside the 1992 Rio Declaration on the Environment and Growth, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.